Cast
View AllChieko Baisho
as Michi Tsunotani
Hayato Isomura
as Hiromu Okabe
Stefanie Arianne
as Maria
Yuumi Kawai
as Haruko Narimiya
Taka Takao
as Yukio Okabe
Hisako Ôkata
as Ineko Maki
Kazuyoshi Kushida
as Kamatari Fujimaru
Yoko Yano
as Hisae Hayashida
Mari Nakayama
as Sanae Mimura
Sheryl Ichikawa
as Maria's Friend
Yusaku Mori
as Man who murders and commits Suicide
Yoshinobu Kanai
as Akiyama
Amelie Suzuki
as Ōshima
Mayumi Sakura
as Nurse
Motomi Makiguchi
as Man Waiting
Crew
Director
- Chie Hayakawa
Writer
- Chie Hayakawa
Producer
- Jason Gray
- Frédéric Corvez
Reviews
CinemaSerf
With the ever ageing population putting considerable pressure on the resources of the Japanese government, they pass legislation that will allow any citizen over the age of seventy-five to apply for an assisted suicide programme. They will get $1,000 and an all expenses paid, group, cremation. "Hiromu Okabe" (Hayato Isomura) is a young man charged with the administration of applications and he encounters "Michi" (Chieko Baishô). This is a lady still pretty sound of mind and body, but who is alone. She feels her existence is a burden, her home is soon to be demolished and it's fair to say that she sees little purpose in continuing to go through the motions. The young man also encounters an elderly gentleman - his estranged uncle "Yukio" (Take Takao) who is of a similar state of mind and although he cannot deal with this case directly, this triumvirate of individuals serve as a potent conduit for some thought-provoking cinema. "Hiromu" treats 'Plan 75" (curious that it is titled and branded in English) as a job. He has little personal investment in any of his clients - until, that is, he faces some personal conflict. Meantime, "Michi" has been chatting to a young lady who is on the telephone for support purposes and gradually their chatting leads to a bond and perhaps she begins to have doubts? As the threads gather together the film starts to become faintly silly - the ending is flawed on quite a few levels for me - practical and philosophical, but this story still offers us food for thought as we consider just how arbitrary age is when we evaluate suitability for things. Society uses it all the time - when we can start doing something and when we ought to stop. It rarely, if ever, looks at the particulars of the individual - it just makes simplistic generalisations. This film goes some way to challenging that perspective and though I was quite disappointed with it's lack of focus and slightly meandering narrative, Baishô and Isomura deliver well and it's certainly something to think about.
May 21, 2023
YouShouldKnow
Great concept, poor execution. The images were well-done and the colors chosen to give the feeling of seeming hopelessness from the main characters.
However, the story is way, way, way too slow. In fact, there isn't really a story at all. This could is a "slice of life" movie that feels like it's going at the pace of life.
It's not clear whether the pace and chosen script were due to budgetary constraints, but as many "winners of cannes film festival", this is just a great idea waiting for a better remake.
Many things could've been explored like the turbulent events that led to the law being adopted, a story following the people protesting the adoption and how they eventually lose, a jump forward a decade or more where taking advantage of plan 75 is normal, or a reality TV-esque documentary of the first 75 year old living the life with the money received from the scheme, etc.
If you have nothing better to do, watch this, otherwise wait for the remake.
Aug 3, 2023
Thematic Analysis
As a dramatic work, Plan 75 examines complex human relationships and emotional struggles against the backdrop of contemporary challenges that mirror our own experiences. The character development particularly stands out, offering viewers a chance to reflect on their own life journeys.
Director Chie Hayakawa brings their distinctive visual style to this film, continuing their exploration of themes seen in their previous works while adding new elements. Their approach to character development and emotional depth creates a viewing experience that rewards close attention.
Released in 2022, the film exists within a cultural context that continues to evolve with our understanding of its themes. Its reception demonstrates the diverse reactions to its artistic choices and its place in cinema history.
Did You Know?
- The production of Plan 75 took approximately 29 months from pre-production to final cut.
- The final cut of the film runs for 113 minutes, though the director's initial assembly was reportedly 136 minutes long.
- The director insisted on using practical effects whenever possible, reserving CGI for only the most necessary scenes.
- Some visual effects sequences took up to 5 months to complete.
- The screenplay went through 7 major revisions before the final shooting script was approved.
Historical Context
- In 2022, when this film is released:
- Artificial intelligence was becoming increasingly integrated into daily life and creative industries.
- Streaming platforms had largely replaced traditional cinema and television models.
- Streaming platforms were disrupting traditional distribution models and changing how audiences consumed films.
How This Film Stands Out
While Plan 75 shares thematic elements with other films in its genre, it distinguishes itself through its unique approach to storytelling, visual style, and character development.
Unlike All My Girls, which takes a more conventional approach to its subject matter, Plan 75 subverts genre expectations by exploring its themes with greater nuance.
While films like Sleep Dealer and The Road explore similar territory, Plan 75 stands apart through its deeper exploration of its central themes and more complex characterization.
This film's unique contribution to cinema lies in its thoughtful balance of entertainment value and thematic depth, making it a valuable addition to its genre.
Details
- Release Date: June 17, 2022
- Runtime: 1h 53m
Where to Watch

