Cast
View All
Channing Tatum
as Caine Wise
Mila Kunis
as Jupiter Jones
Sean Bean
as Stinger Apini
Eddie Redmayne
as Balem Abrasax
Douglas Booth
as Titus Abrasax
Tuppence Middleton
as Kalique Abrasax
Nikki Amuka-Bird
as Diomika Tsing
Christina Cole
as Gemma Chatterjee
Edward Hogg
as Chicanery Night
Maria Doyle Kennedy
as Aleksa
Vanessa Kirby
as Katharine Dunlevy
Jeremy Swift
as Vasilliy Bolodnikov
Bae Doona
as Razo
James D'Arcy
as Maximilian Jones
Kick Gurry
as Vladie
Crew
Director
- Lilly Wachowski
- Lana Wachowski
Writer
- Lilly Wachowski
- Lana Wachowski
Producer
- Lana Wachowski
- Lilly Wachowski
- Grant Hill
Reviews
Reno
> One liner, somewhat richer, but only a decent entertainer.
A sci-fantasy directed by the Wachowskis of 'The Matrix' fame. Theirs lowest point ever as the filmmakers, but still not that bad flick. The movie lacked in many areas, and one of those is failing to have at least one stunning fight/war scene. I know it was only the beginning and there will be a sequel, maybe ends as a trilogy, but the story was very weak for an intro movie.
Looks like one-liner, precisely to say kind of similar to 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy'. I mean in a thin idea, the whole story takes place. Something like a space expedition for a chosen one, hopping from a planet to planet, seeking answers and protection. The title character, Jupiter Jones, played by Mila Kunis, with the help of the Caine Wise (Channing Tatum) takes a risky venture when their lives were threatened. Finding who's behind and other truth brings the end of the narration, which runs for just over a 2 hour.
Performances were okay, but kind of doubt their inclusion in the project. Mostly the cast was the younger ones, maybe except, Sean Bean. Many of them are only the recently emerged stars. So it was a big responsibility in a big budget movie and they did it. But the movie should have had at least one senior artist. The graphics were somewhat rich, and again the absence of the quality scenes and stunts lets the movie fall.
6½/10
Sep 24, 2015
Per Gunnar Jonsson
It appears that I am going to disagree with a fair number of people when I say that I quite liked this movie. Sure, if you expect some deep story with a lot of moral cleverness in it you are going to be disappointed. This is an interesting story but one that hangs together by a fairly fine thread.
To me it is a decent enough story that is propelled by a decent enough action and absolutely wonderful scenery. Yes, I agree with everyone saying that it is a bit of a B-story. It has many issues and barely hangs together at times.
However, if you try to ignore that for a while and just try to view it as a piece of, fairly fast paced, visual entertainment, well then it hits the spot quite well. It is frequently beautiful to watch. The action sequences are not bad and the story is, if nothing else, certainly not the usual thirteen to a dozen B-movie repeats. The acting is, well, also generally of B-movie quality but it is not downright bad and, once I got in the right mindset for the movie, it did not disturb me.
On the whole I quite liked this movie but I guess you have to be a bit of sci-fi fan, with an emphasize on visuals, to do so.
Dec 22, 2017
Thematic Analysis
This high-octane Science Fiction/Fantasy/Action film balances spectacular sequences with character-driven moments. Unlike many films in the genre, Jupiter Ascending distinguishes itself through a unique visual style and creative action choreography.
Director Lilly Wachowski brings their distinctive visual style to this film, continuing their exploration of themes seen in their previous works while adding new elements. Their approach to pacing and visual storytelling creates a viewing experience that rewards close attention.
Released in 2015, the film exists within a cultural context that continues to evolve with our understanding of its themes. Its reception demonstrates the diverse reactions to its artistic choices and its place in cinema history.
Did You Know?
- The production of Jupiter Ascending took approximately 22 months from pre-production to final cut.
- With a budget of $176.0 million, the film proved to be a financial success, earning back its investment and more.
- The final cut of the film runs for 127 minutes, though the director's initial assembly was reportedly 154 minutes long.
- Several scenes were filmed in multiple locations to capture the perfect setting.
- The screenplay went through 8 major revisions before the final shooting script was approved.
- The costume department created over 346 unique costume pieces for the production.
Historical Context
- In 2015, when this film is released:
- Climate change awareness was becoming a central global concern.
- Smartphones and social media had transformed daily life and communication.
- Streaming platforms were disrupting traditional distribution models and changing how audiences consumed films.
How This Film Stands Out
While Jupiter Ascending shares thematic elements with other films in its genre, it distinguishes itself through its unique approach to storytelling, visual style, and character development.
Unlike Critters 4, which takes a more conventional approach to its subject matter, Jupiter Ascending offers a fresh perspective through its innovative visual language and narrative structure.
While films like Critters 3 and Izo explore similar territory, Jupiter Ascending stands apart through its distinctive directorial vision and pacing.
This film's unique contribution to cinema lies in its thoughtful balance of entertainment value and thematic depth, making it a valuable addition to its genre.
Details
- Release Date: February 4, 2015
- Runtime: 2h 7m
- Budget: $176,000,000
- Revenue: $184,000,000
Where to Watch
