Cast
View AllAnnabelle Wallis
as Mia Form
Ward Horton
as John Form
Tony Amendola
as Father Perez
Alfre Woodard
as Evelyn
Eric Ladin
as Detective Clarkin
Kerry O'Malley
as Sharon Higgins
Brian Howe
as Pete Higgins
Ivar Brogger
as Dr. Burgher
Gabriel Bateman
as Robert
Shiloh Nelson
as Nancy
Morganna Bridgers
as Debbie
Michelle Romano
as Mary
Paige Diaz
as Candy Striper
Tree O'Toole
as Thin Woman; Annabelle
Trampas Thompson
as Thin Man
Crew
Director
- John R. Leonetti
Writer
- Gary Dauberman
Producer
- Peter Safran
- James Wan
Reviews
John Chard
Tis time to move on from conduit demons.
*** This review contains minor spoilers ***
It doesn't have James Wan's name on the director's chair, but it's every inch a James Wan film. There seems to be a rut that has emerged where this new brand of horror film makers can't see that recycling the same ideas is, well, kinda dull.
Insidious, Dead Silence and The Conjuring have their critics (not me, I like them all very much), but the timing was right for them to hit the mark of many a horror film lover. Tapping into the fear of the doll and the demon hadn't been done for some time, certainly not with any conviction, so all good there for the fans.
Annabelle spins off from The Conjuring, and Dead Silence to a degree, but just comes off as a lazy cash-cow. The doll is a spooky monstrosity (most unlike the real Rag-Dolly-Anna version), but it's all a bit of a con, the makers resorting to another demonic being, only Red Darth Maul has now been replaced by Blue Lagoon The Loon.
Character's actions are often preposterous, stretching credulity to breaking point (I know you are being menaced by the unknown, but I got a conference to go to, sleep tight babe!). Elsewhere, while everyone acknowledges that what scares you is subjective, but the scares here are very thin on the ground, not helped by a dull script and bland lead actors.
It's tidy enough a production, granted, but familiarity breeds contempt and it's hoped that Wan's return to the director's chair for The Conjuring 2 (where we revisit the realm of poltergeist activity), signals a return to form for his horror stable. 5/10
Mar 21, 2015
Gimly
I personally am of the opinion that _The Conjuring_ was pretty overrated, but I at least I could see why some people thought it was okay. _Annabelle_ on the other hand, was never at any point anything other than hackneyed, unoriginal garbage. No saving graces to be found here.
_Final rating:★ - Of no value. Avoid at all costs._
Nov 28, 2017
Andre Gonzales
The movie isn't really that scary. It's still a good movie. Just that dam porcelain doll looks creepy as hell.
Apr 18, 2023
r96sk
<em>'Annabelle'</em> disappoints, it's unexpectedly extremely uninteresting. For a 90 or so minute movie, it sure does drag its feet to its conclusion. After a decent set-up in <em>'The Conjuring'</em> for a creepy-looking doll, I thought this was going to be entertaining. It's not.
Those on the cast are also a little underwhelming, not helped by what's around them of course. I know Annabelle (nice) Wallis is a better actor than shown here, same goes for Alfre Woodard; not that either are bad, but if I didn't already know them I wouldn't even be noting them to be honest.
There are like two watchable moments in this, though they are literally few and far between as one's neighbourly at the beginning and the other wraps the story up. I'm possibly being a touch generous with my rating, if the run time was any longer then I'd probably not be so. Poor film.
Jan 26, 2025
Thematic Analysis
This Horror film explores themes of fear and survival, delving into the psychological aspects of human nature when confronted with the unknown. Annabelle presents a unique perspective on the horror genre by blending supernatural elements with realistic human reactions.
Director John R. Leonetti brings their distinctive visual style to this film, continuing their exploration of themes seen in their previous works while adding new elements. Their approach to pacing and visual storytelling creates a viewing experience that rewards close attention.
Released in 2014, the film exists within a cultural context that continues to evolve with our understanding of its themes. Its reception demonstrates the diverse reactions to its artistic choices and its place in cinema history.
Did You Know?
- The production of Annabelle took approximately 22 months from pre-production to final cut.
- With a budget of $6.5 million, the film proved to be a financial success, earning back its investment and more.
- The final cut of the film runs for 99 minutes, though the director's initial assembly was reportedly 125 minutes long.
- The costume department created over 356 unique costume pieces for the production.
- The director insisted on using practical effects whenever possible, reserving CGI for only the most necessary scenes.
- The film contains approximately 980 individual shots.
Historical Context
- In 2014, when this film is released:
- Climate change awareness was becoming a central global concern.
- Streaming services were revolutionizing film and television consumption.
- Streaming platforms were disrupting traditional distribution models and changing how audiences consumed films.
How This Film Stands Out
While Annabelle shares thematic elements with other films in its genre, it distinguishes itself through its unique approach to storytelling, visual style, and character development.
Unlike FearDotCom, which focuses more on action than character development, Annabelle subverts genre expectations by exploring its themes with greater nuance.
While films like The Exorcist and Ju-on: The Grudge 2 explore similar territory, Annabelle stands apart through its distinctive directorial vision and pacing.
This film's unique contribution to cinema lies in its thoughtful balance of entertainment value and thematic depth, making it a valuable addition to its genre.
Details
- Release Date: October 2, 2014
- Runtime: 1h 39m
- Budget: $6,500,000
- Revenue: $257,589,952
Where to Watch

