The only flaw in their plan was her.
Director: Barbet Schroeder
Producer: Barbet Schroeder, Susan Hoffman
Tenacious homicide detective Cassie Mayweather and her still-green partner are working a murder case, attempting to profile two malevolently brilliant young men: cold, calculating killers whose dark secrets might explain their crimes.
120 min
Rating: 6.143/10
Released
Watch Trailer
Top Cast
Sandra Bullock
Cassie Mayweather
Ben Chaplin
Sam Kennedy
Ryan Gosling
Richard Haywood
Michael Pitt
Justin Pendleton
Agnes Bruckner
Lisa Mills
Chris Penn
Ray Feathers
Movie Info
Director: Barbet Schroeder
Producer: Barbet Schroeder, Susan Hoffman
Production Companies: Castle Rock Entertainment, Schroeder Hoffman Productions, Warner Bros. Pictures
Countries: United States of America
Similar Movies
Are You Lonesome Tonight?
1992-01-22
When the Love Is Gone
2013-11-27
Children of Paradise
1945-03-15
Running Out of Time
1999-09-23
Firetrap
2001-03-16
Belle Époque
1992-12-04
What Lies Beneath
2000-07-21
The Bounty
1984-05-04
Number One
1973-05-28
The Devil's Path
2013-09-21
Hinugot sa Langit
1985-06-06
Double Indemnity
1944-07-06
Mulholland Drive
2001-06-06
Heavenly Creatures
1994-09-12
Blow-Up
1966-12-18
Arlington Road
1999-03-19
Point Break
1991-07-12
The Prestige
2006-10-17
The Talented Mr. Ripley
1999-12-25
Hollywoodland
2006-08-31User Reviews
What Others Said
John Chard:
A pact made with relentless fire that requires that, while some live, others die.
A modern spin on the Leopold and Loeb case, directed by Barbet Schroeder and starring Sandra Bullock as a cop with emotional baggage trying to prove that two high school kids (Ryan Gosling and Michael Pitt) have committed what they think is the perfect murder - just for kicks, allegedly.
There's nothing exactly awful about the film, it's well performed by the principal players, engrossing in narrative, beautifully lensed by Luciano Tovoli and Schroeder layers the production with a suitable feeling of unease. Sadly there's no psychological depth given the two boys by writer Tony Gayton, which renders the whole motives and means, and the investigation of such, as being a shallow exercise in thriller film making.
Running at two hours in length doesn't help matters, because this further irritates that more meat was not written onto Gosling and Pitt's bones, while it also exposes just how hackneyed and clichéd the picture is. Which when the story should be psychologically profound, marks this out as a frustrating viewing experience. 6/10
JPV852:
Decent crime-thriller that I saw back in 2002 (probably in theaters as I did go on a weekly basis back then) and while never really impressed me, still found it watchable thanks to the performances from a young Ryan Gosling (only his fifth film) and Michael Pitt, and Sandra Bullock was alright as a damaged homicide detective. Plot plays like an episode of Criminal Minds, which isn't a bad thing to me. Also fun seeing Nick Offerman in a bit role. **3.25/5**
CinemaSerf:
This is yet another role in which Sandra Bullock plays a cop on the outskirts of her team. She is "Cassie", a woman with intimacy issues who gets teamed up with "Sam" (Ben Chaplin) whom she toys with as if he were a kitten both personally and on their case to investigate what looks like the perfect murder. A distinct lack of clues leads her bloodhound nose to a school where, without the slightest shred of evidence, she alights on the wealthy "Haywood" (Ryan Gosling) to whom she takes an instant dislike. Further ferreting around lead the pair to "Pendleton" (Michael Pitt) who is partial to a little caviar, as was the corpse. Might they all be connected? I've rarely seen a potentially decent ensemble cast wasted like this. Bullock just isn't at the races, her character is frankly really quite boring and the rapport with the out of his depth Chaplin just doesn't work. There is the glimmer of an homo-erotic relationship between Gosling and the always enigmatic Pitt, but I think maybe that is just because my brain was scrabbling around trying to find a reason to make it through this really disappointing feature. In the end it is a battle of wills, and those who seem to hold all the aces play their hand as if their arms had been amputated; serendipity plays way too big a part in the denouement and at just shy of two hours, I found myself looking out of the window at the seagulls more than I might have liked. Not very good!