Ran

Ran

Ran Poster
YouTube Thumbnail

In a mad world, only the mad are sane.

Director: Akira Kurosawa

Producer: Masato Hara, Serge Silberman

With Ran, legendary director Akira Kurosawa reimagines Shakespeare's King Lear as a singular historical epic set in sixteenth-century Japan. Majestic in scope, the film is Kurosawa's late-life masterpiece, a profound examination of the folly of war and the crumbling of one family under the weight of betrayal, greed, and the insatiable thirst for power.

160 min Rating: 8.058/10 Released
Watch Trailer

Top Cast

Tatsuya Nakadai
Tatsuya Nakadai
Lord Hidetora Ichimonji
Akira Terao
Akira Terao
Taro Takatora Ichimonji
Jinpachi Nezu
Jinpachi Nezu
Jiro Masatora Ichimonji
Daisuke Ryū
Daisuke Ryū
Saburo Naotora Ichimonji
Mieko Harada
Mieko Harada
Lady Kaede

Movie Info

Director: Akira Kurosawa

Producer: Masato Hara, Serge Silberman

Production Companies: Nippon Herald Films, Greenwich Film Production, Herald Ace

Countries: Japan, France

Now Streaming On

BFI Player Amazon Channel
BFI Player Amazon Channel

Similar Movies

Alexander
Alexander
2004-11-21
Bandidas
Bandidas
2006-01-18
4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
2007-08-24
The Edge of Heaven
The Edge of Heaven
2007-09-27
The Patriot
The Patriot
2000-06-28
Open Range
Open Range
2003-08-11
UMUT
UMUT
2024-06-05
Running Out of Time
Running Out of Time
1999-09-23
Eragon
Eragon
2006-12-14
Lady Snowblood
Lady Snowblood
1973-12-01
Nobody Knows
Nobody Knows
2004-08-07
The Bible: In the Beginning...
The Bible: In the Beginning...
1966-09-28
Innerspace
Innerspace
1987-07-01
The Game
The Game
1997-09-12
Z
Z
1969-02-26
The Root of All Evil
The Root of All Evil
1947-02-05

User Reviews

What Others Said

Filipe Manuel Neto: **A good film, full of detail and historical verisimilitude, but painfully long without needing to be.** I've already seen two of Akira Kurosawa's most renowned films and, quite frankly, I still can't understand why this Japanese director is so commonly considered a cinematic genius. His films are quite good, they're meticulous, there's a lot of attention to detail, but they're not particularly unforgettable… that's what I think. This film is an adaptation of the plot of “King Lear”, by Shakespeare: a warlord, in the middle of the Japanese feudal era, decides to withdraw and divide his lands, power and castles among his three sons. Only one of them disagrees and warns him that it is highly unlikely that they will stay together as brothers, which provokes the old father's wrath. However, the future proves true for the younger son's words when the two older brothers despise their father and conflicts begin. Driven mad and accompanied only by a fool, the old man ends up mad while the brothers fight each other. I won't talk about the cast because I don't know these actors. I can only say that they worked well, within the context and the type of film we are talking about. There is an excessive stylization, both in terms of interpretation and in terms of dialogues, which sounds theatrical, forced, but I don't know if that was on purpose. On a technical level, the film has a lot of points in its favor, starting with an excellent cinematography, very colorful and with good lighting. The sets are superb, in particular the castles, recreated to the smallest detail, and the costumes are also good, beautiful and historically credible. I don't think I'll be being unfair if I say that this film probably has some of the best war scenes in period films set in Japan. There is no CGI, special effects have been used judiciously, and the war has been recreated to be as authentic as possible, with hundreds of extras dressed to the nines and a lot of effort on the part of the production. For a historian, you can't ask for more. The big problem with this movie is that it wasn't made to entertain but to make you think, and it's full of scenes and sequences designed to make the viewer think about what they're watching. It's something that would work, if it weren't sometimes overly cryptic. The audience needs to understand what the director wants to convey, and that often doesn't happen. Furthermore, it is a film that does not spare the audience: it starts very well, it ends very well, but everything in between is unbearably prolonged and distended. What could be said or done in two minutes is done in five minutes, and there are a lot of dialogues and scenes that don't seem to have any function other than to make the film take longer.