La Belle et la Bête

User Score
Votes
Share
Rate

La Belle et la Bête Overview

Beauty and the Beast is the adaptation of a story by Madame de Villeneuve. Published anonymously in 1740 as La Jeune Américaine et les contes marins, it paints a portrait of Belle, a joyful and touching young girl who falls in love with the Beast, a cursed creature in search of love and redemption. In 1760, a condensed children’s version was published. It was from this version that Jean Cocteau and then Walt Disney drew their famous adaptations. Overshadowed, the original version by Madame de Villeneuve has never been adapted for the screen... until now!

Who Stars in La Belle et la Bête

Vincent Cassel
La bête

Vincent Cassel

Léa Seydoux
La belle

Léa Seydoux

André Dussollier
Belle's father

André Dussollier

Eduardo Noriega
Perducas

Eduardo Noriega

Myriam Charleins
Astrid

Myriam Charleins

Audrey Lamy
Anne

Audrey Lamy


Recommendations

Cinderella
Beautiful Creatures
Beastly
The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones
Mirror Mirror
Enchanted
Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters
The Princess and the Frog
Snow White and the Huntsman
Rubinrot
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
A Cinderella Story: Once Upon a Song
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
Maleficent
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
The Twilight Saga: New Moon
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1
Mulan II
Saphirblau
Pocahontas

Review for La Belle et la Bête

Author: Reno

**The French version of the famous fairy-tale.** I should have seen this before the latest Disney version of the tale. It came a couple of years ago, with a wonderful cast and visuals. French cinema is not a great vfx powerhouse. Unlike most of the famous Hollywood mythical and fairy tales originated from Europe, it's rare to see them converted to films in the similar fashion in its homeland. One of the reasons was the international market, to earn back everything they have spent for it, and more. When such projects do happen, sometimes the filmmakers tie up with Hollywood co-production to secure returns. Even if you take this film's worldwide box office, nothing overwhelming. But the challenge they had taken was truly appreciable. That's not it, this is the most redesigned versions of them all I've seen so far. Because I haven't seen any other than Disney's, excluding the modern timeline adaptation like 'Beastly', 'I' et cetera. Yeah, even the Disney's live-action retained original from their animated version, but visually extraordinary. And in here, the story was same, thought told in a different way. The graphics too were very nice, I did not expect that. Despite it is being a fantasy and a children's tale, the contents were more serious. That reveals they were very keen to bring the adults to the screens than the kids. Yet nothing too seriously targeted the grownups like 'Tale of Tales'. Everyone knows the basic storyline of this tale. A recently lost their fortune, a family of six siblings with their father relocates to a small farmhouse. No one other than the youngest daughter, Belle, was happy to be in such nature surrounded place. But one day when her father got into a big trouble, she takes his position and becomes a prisoner in an abandoned castle. Since then she begins to learn about the mystery man of the castle, particularly his past, reason to be ended like that. And following, a twist in the narration leading to the finale, everyone's fate will be revealed. > ❝Remember... A life for a rose.❞ The film was two hours long and well filled with the scenes in it all over. It doesn't feel like we're watching a fantasy film. The colours, costumes, medieval story, misty mountain, all is the major reminder that you are watching a fairy-tale. Though you won't get anything magical from the story right away. Not until the third act. As for the story, from such vastly known tale, you can't expect any major surprise. As I said, some minor changes can be witnessed throughout. But such kind of scale the flick has in all the department, that too coming from Europe makes it a very special. Definitely no to comparison with the Disney's. Both of them were fine products on their own way. But people would compare and pick one when they are based on the same source. That can't be stopped. Disney had created their own brand, aiming for kids. You can find the people who liked both the live-actions. I never knew the original tale, I mean from the original source/text. Those who are familiar with are saying, this is most closest one. But something I did not understand was the Beast was cute furry Beast, just like Disney's. I anticipated something tough physique, hard character, I mean Beast as a real Beastly. Excluding that slight displeasure, I have had no other complaints with the film. I enjoyed it, yet there's another thing which is actually a question rather than a disagreement. The actors did their parts, though I felt the Beast character should have been played by a younger one. Vincent Cassel is a brilliant French actor and he did his best for it. Lea Seydoux as Beauty surely an excellent pick. The direction was good. Cautiously spent for everything in the film. So they have got a fine final product. Most of the people going for it, only keeping in mind Disney. You won't get that Disney's singing, dancing, overall appeal. One must clear off his mind from any great ideas and then only give it a try. Remember, it is not a very good film, but simply a good film. _7/10_


Images related to La Belle et la Bête

Production


Canal+


Studio Babelsberg

Eskwad

TMC


Pathé!

120 Films


TF1


Ciné+


TF1 Films Production


Facts

Status
Released

Release Date
2014-02-12

Original Language
French

Runtime
1 hr 52 mins

Budget
$ 33,000,000.00 (Estimated)

Revenue
$ 49,100,000.00 (USA)

Profit
$ 16,100,000.00 (Estimated in USA)

Homepage
http://www.labelleetlabete-lefilm.com/

Genres
Fantasy Romance

Keywords
based on novel or book magic castle fairy tale transformation forest love surrealism curse man beast beast giant man healing power based on fairy tale picturesque


What do you think of this movie?